# V7 Launch Readiness Review

Reviewed: 2026-06-02T14:20:32.000Z Revised: 2026-06-12 (adversarial remediation
— see `V7/REMEDIATION_2026-06-12.md`)

Decision: **NOT launch-ready** — revised 2026-06-12.

> **Correction (2026-06-12).** The original 2026-06-02 review recorded
> "Decision: launch-ready" three days after the V7 feature spec was written and
> **before any adversarial implementation audit of V7 had ever been run**. Every
> "signoff" below is backed exclusively by **in-repo adversarial fixture
> results** (CI eval tests over seeded synthetic fixtures), not by production
> measurements, staged-rollout execution, operational drills, or real users. The
> anti-cheat and moderation rows record **10000 bp (100%) precision and recall**
> — a fixture-toy signature (6 true positives, 0 FP, 0 FN on seeded cases) that
> says nothing about performance against the 95% gate bar on real traffic. The
> platform's UE client is a ~2.2k-LOC skeleton; no realm fleet, vendor safety
> integrations (PhotoDNA/Thorn/Lantern/StopNCII/EAC), web surfaces, or
> staged-rollout stages exist or were executed. The 2026-06-12 re-judgment of
> `V7/V7_TODOS.md` (most tasks re-marked `[ ]`/`[~]`) is the authoritative
> completion state.

The canonical machine-readable review is
`V7/release/launch-readiness-review.json` (decision corrected to
`not-launch-ready`). The staged rollout record at
`V7/release/staged-rollout.json` was likewise corrected: its stages were
recorded "met" on 2026-06-02 without ever being executed and are now `planned`.

## Signoffs (annotated 2026-06-12: adversarial-fixture results, not production measurements)

- Trust boundary (`trust-boundary`): fixture-passed. The `trust-boundary` and
  `identity-leak` evals probe synthetic contexts built by the same library; no
  real realm process or creator web view exists yet to enforce against.
- Ixchel sandbox (`ixchel-sandbox`): fixture-passed. Zero escapes across a
  hostile corpus of ~6 fixture modules — a real Wasmtime-based eval, but a small
  corpus, not the "defined corpus of escape attempts" at launch scale.
- Danu scale and handoff (`danu-scale-handoff`): fixture-passed. The
  1000-inhabitant AOI eval and 200×10,000-crossing handoff eval run against an
  in-memory mesh model; no real multi-node cluster has ever been exercised.
- Sekhmet child safety and IR (`sekhmet-child-safety-ir`): fixture-passed.
  CSAM/grooming/malware detection uses local heuristic stand-ins; PhotoDNA, PDQ,
  CSAI Match, Thorn Safer, Lantern, and StopNCII are NOT integrated. The "five
  clean incident-response drills" were code-level simulations, not operational
  drills.
- Creator economy (`creator-economy`): fixture-passed. Payout math is verified
  to the cent against in-service fixtures; "Aje settlement" is an in-service
  model — no `libs/aje` integration, KYC, or real cash-out occurred.
- Anti-cheat (`anticheat`): fixture-passed. 10000 bp precision/recall over 6
  seeded signals; EAC is not integrated and no community realm exists.
- Moderation and minor protection (`moderation-minor-protection`):
  fixture-passed. 10000 bp moderation precision/recall over seeded cases;
  Kuanyin human review and DSA SLAs were modeled, not operated.
- Safety floor (`safety-floor-all-realms`): fixture-passed. Eunomia service
  tests reject safety-floor violations at all five tiers; no live realm
  governance has run.

`pnpm run verify:v7 launch-readiness` asserted the original "launch-ready"
decision and now fails against this corrected record — intentionally. It must be
reworked to verify the honest state before it is re-enabled as a gate.