Disciplines · Audits

Eve SOTA future-workbench seam totality gate

Every future workbench phase must end with **required Eve reads and writes admitted with source and behavior evidence, or an exact task-0.8 explicit non-goal proves zero operations; a named defer preserves ownership but never

5sections3 minread

On this page
  • Task: 1.9
  • Evaluated: 2026-09-08
  • Decision: required-workbench-completion-gates-fail-closed
  • Record digest: 5eb808b6ae7c6916106d8cc3c18711cab3863692f4453dda3b76beb5895c031c

Exit-gate rule#

Every future workbench phase must end with required Eve reads and writes admitted with source and behavior evidence, or an exact task-0.8 explicit non-goal proves zero operations; a named defer preserves ownership but never passes completion. The gate discovers post-M workbench phases from the canonical ledger; a new phase without an explicit policy, ratified task-0.8 binding, and terminal exit task fails generation.

Phase Domain Task-0.8 workflow Terminal gate Route/state candidates Source files Completion Accountable owner
Y yemaya wf-6be56b986038c275e65f Y9.19 529 3302 false (deferred-required-seam) Yemaya workbench owner and Eve platform integration owner
V veritas wf-a2fdf39b610659ae414f V9.25 178 1284 false (deferred-required-seam) Veritas workbench owner and Eve platform integration owner
E euterpe wf-82fbadf80500a88d0e1c E9.22 34 993 false (deferred-required-seam) Euterpe workbench owner and Eve platform integration owner
A aja wf-754e9a3efee4f3775706 A8.20 174 600 false (deferred-required-seam) Aja workbench owner and Eve platform integration owner
B bellona wf-8a841ecd53ab847c41cc B9.19 203 1053 false (deferred-required-seam) Bellona workbench owner and Eve platform integration owner

Why this is fail-closed#

  • The terminal task must be the final top-level checklist item in its phase and contain the canonical marker and clause.
  • Every phase is bound to an exact ratified task-0.8 required workflow and its complete requirement-ID set.
  • Required workbench completion needs both admitted read and write operation classes with byte-pinned source and behavior proof.
  • A defer retains owner and unblock metadata but always returns a failing completion result.
  • A zero-operation boundary passes only with an exact task-0.8 explicit-non-goal workflow and requirement; missing implementation is not a non-goal.
  • The candidate ratchet covers every discovered BFF/bridge operation source plus every source file carrying a state signal.
  • The code-envelope ratchet covers all tracked production source in each domain, so even a novel persistence mechanism changes the reviewed digest.
  • The real CLI evaluates missing-read, missing-write, deferred-required, source-backed non-goal, and admitted-operation cases with retained exit-code expectations.

Gate CLI contract cases#

Case Obligation Expected exit Completion Reasons
missing-required-read required-seam 1 false missing-required-read
missing-required-write required-seam 1 false missing-required-write
deferred-required-seam required-seam 1 false missing-required-read, missing-required-write, deferred-required-seam, required-seam-unavailable
valid-source-backed-non-goal zero-operation-boundary 0 true none
real-admitted-operations required-seam 0 true none

Coverage#

  • Governed phases: 5
  • Route/state candidates: 1118
  • Missing policies: 0
  • Missing exit gates: 0
  • Unclassified candidates: 0
  • Blocked required phases: 5
  • Completion-satisfied phases: 0
  • Gate contract cases: 5
  • Contract totality: true

Honest limits#

  • This gate closes task 1.9 only. It does not complete phases Y/V/E/A/B, admit a new Eve view or command for those phases, or close G4.
  • Every governed phase is a task-0.8 required workflow and is currently unavailable; its named defer preserves accountable ownership but the recorded completion result is false.
  • The positive admitted-operation control uses Tara read and write contracts that already exist in the repository to prove the gate can pass real source- and behavior-backed operations; it does not transfer Tara coverage to Y/V/E/A/B.
  • The zero-operation control is limited to one exact task-0.8 explicit non-goal about avoiding a tenth content pipeline. Absence of implementation, a defer, or an invented verdict cannot substitute for that source binding.
  • The code-envelope ratchet covers every tracked production TypeScript, JavaScript, Rust, and Prisma source under each domain root plus discovered BFF/bridge route files; generated binaries, untracked files, runtime-only routes, and shared stores with no domain route reference remain outside this static census.
  • State candidates are conservative static signals and include in-memory or pure stores; a candidate is a demand for an explicit disposition, not proof that the state is durable or operator-visible.
  • Behavior evidence is repository test-harness evidence, not a staging or production observation. Each future phase must replace its unavailable disposition with its own runtime evidence before exit.